Doing research with young people is something we love to do, as they are willing to assist and provide candid feedback. They are enthusiastic about sharing their thoughts but are also attuned to the views of their peers. When co-creating with them, it is important to consider this dynamic in the research approach: use engaging materials, keep things straightforward, and try to leverage group dynamics in a constructive way.
Recently, we collaborated with the Dutch Judiciary Council (Raad voor de Rechtspraak), which ensures that judges can effectively carry out their duties and advocate for judicial interests in politics. Their mission also involves educating the public on the significance of justice in our society. Establishing a fair and impartial justice system that can resolve conflicts effectively is crucial. To maintain and promote a just society in the future, younger generations need to comprehend their role and responsibility in this complex issue.
Significance and challenges of engaging young citizens
In the Netherlands, secondary schools play a crucial role in educating students about the complexities of democracy and the principles of justice. The Judiciary Council engages with young citizens at various moments throughout the year, whether through school visits or open days at courts. During these interactions, young citizens have the opportunity to witness real court proceedings and engage in conversations with actual judges. To enhance these experiences, the council enlisted the support of Stby to collaborate with secondary school students in co-creating a concept for a meaningful giveaway to be handed to youngsters following these encounters.
Co-creating meaningful objects
While making a fun giveaway is easy, adding meaning to it for this young target audience, in relation to their courtroom visit and discussions with a judge about justice, can be more challenging. To collaboratively develop a concept for a giveaway that holds meaning, we initiated discussions with a broader focus on justice and jurisdiction.
By crafting engaging materials, we sought to grasp the young citizens’ interest in the intricacies of a judge’s role within our society. And we structured the sessions to encourage interactive participation. Beginning with a broad approach and gradually focusing on specific details, we aimed to cater to the diverse perspectives present within the group, while acknowledging the prevalent peer dynamics at this developmental stage. Additionally, we devised a method to enable students to express their individual viewpoints, recognising the significance of fostering personal agency amongst group dynamics.
I am curious about this situation. How would a judge handle this situation?
Pupils about situations in which justice can play a role.This happens often, but I don’t really know the consequences in this situation.
Insights for different purposes and multiple levels
Through a series of five sessions conducted at three secondary schools in the Netherlands, we got insightful responses. By delving into the concept of justice and advocating for young individuals, we collaborated with them to develop a concept for an engaging and meaningful giveaway. Our team presented a comprehensive analysis to our client, outlining the significance and engagement levels surrounding justice discourse. Additionally, we recommended unique perspectives to aid in the creation of a giveaway that not only resonated with the target demographic but enhanced the quality of materials provided to them. Furthermore, we offered suggestions for educational resources, website content, and promotional materials. Our goal was to equip our client with valuable insights that could be utilised across various platforms for years to come, underscoring the essence of foundational research.
I would like to get something that I can use more often.
Pupils about giveaways.
I like a combination of education and fun for the giveaway.